I would appreciate very much, if I could declare a keyword as a parents Keyword, with all its XMP information etc.
But then all keywords (childern) beneath would take automaticaly the declaration from the parents keyword.
"Actions" (Here all information are declared etc.)
-->Football (Takes the ...
Search found 46 matches
- 02 Nov 17 8:37
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Feature Request parents - children Keywordstructure
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3177
- 24 Oct 17 6:15
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Photos with only privat labels / keywords
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4635
Re: Photos with only privat labels / keywords
Thanks sanphotgn for your answer.
If we should change from PSu to an other programm, then we could define the keywords with the parameters at this time and write it once to the photos. But till to that point, we could much more easy add and change keywords much more easy.
If we should change from PSu to an other programm, then we could define the keywords with the parameters at this time and write it once to the photos. But till to that point, we could much more easy add and change keywords much more easy.
- 23 Oct 17 14:57
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Photos with only privat labels / keywords
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4635
Photos with only privat labels / keywords
I'm sorry to come again with a question like this:
Is there any problem, if we have our collection of Photos only with Privat labels or keywords? The handling, to add new keywords, is much easier. So there will be none informationen writen in to the files. The keywords are only in the catalogue ...
Is there any problem, if we have our collection of Photos only with Privat labels or keywords? The handling, to add new keywords, is much easier. So there will be none informationen writen in to the files. The keywords are only in the catalogue ...
- 11 Oct 17 19:19
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Why Photo Supreme?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10605
Re: Why Photo Supreme?
PSu is running on a server with Multi User Access! Adobe LR etc. doesn’t!
- 09 Oct 17 16:08
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: How to delet a categorie
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2291
How to delet a categorie
How can I delete a category, which is automatic generated? This category is now empty. The command is in the context menu greyed out.
- 07 Oct 17 11:46
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: to speed up the synchronisation
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5224
Re: to speed up the synchronisation
Just two additional questions:
There is the possiblitiy to write the Meta-Data in a side-care File. The other posibility is theses to write to the Picture-file.
Which one of these two methods is faster relating synchronizing?
And where do I define, that the side-cars will be created?
There is the possiblitiy to write the Meta-Data in a side-care File. The other posibility is theses to write to the Picture-file.
Which one of these two methods is faster relating synchronizing?
And where do I define, that the side-cars will be created?
- 06 Oct 17 8:39
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: to speed up the synchronisation
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5224
Re: to speed up the synchronisation
Ok. I have pushed up the Priority of the Process in the Taskmanager. one step more then normal is ok. two step more then normal causes a crash of PSu.
At least the synchronisation run now with about 40%, about twice of normal.
But it is not as fast as I would love it.
At least the synchronisation run now with about 40%, about twice of normal.
But it is not as fast as I would love it.
- 05 Oct 17 12:46
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: to speed up the synchronisation
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5224
to speed up the synchronisation
On my client, the pictures and postgres db on the windows server 2012R2, the process of synchronisation takes very long time. 0.1% in appr. 20 Sek.
I have tuned the postgres db according the manuel!
Is there an other solution to speed up the whole thing. On the Windows Server as on my client ...
I have tuned the postgres db according the manuel!
Is there an other solution to speed up the whole thing. On the Windows Server as on my client ...
- 05 Oct 17 12:40
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Red Eye and zoom -> Access Violation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3095
- 04 Oct 17 15:18
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Share to Email or Folder is missing
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2664
Re: Share to Email or Folder is missing
It is solved! I can configure it and instruct the user not to delete it anymore!
- 04 Oct 17 13:39
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Share to Email or Folder is missing
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2664
Share to Email or Folder is missing
A teacher is comming and said to me, that share to email, or share to Folder is anymore available. That means, these two icons are not anymore there!
What must I do?- 03 Oct 17 8:51
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Red Eye and zoom -> Access Violation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3095
Red Eye and zoom -> Access Violation
When I try to remove red eyes an access violation happend.
I mark the file, then I go to "Adjust" - Filters - Red Eye Correction.
Mouse with cross to the eye and mark it as mentioned.
Everything is ok.
1. But when I zoom in, that the eye get bigger, than an access violation can sometimes occure ...
I mark the file, then I go to "Adjust" - Filters - Red Eye Correction.
Mouse with cross to the eye and mark it as mentioned.
Everything is ok.
1. But when I zoom in, that the eye get bigger, than an access violation can sometimes occure ...
- 03 Oct 17 6:57
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Labels assign to field "State"
- Replies: 19
- Views: 15806
Re: Labels assign to field "State"
Oh, slowly the light is brightening up.
So I can creat a whole tree of labels, to geht some structure.
Clip06.jpg
But I can declare, that a Label is private, so it remains just in the catalog and will not be writen in the file (C)
Or I can declare, that a label is not a keyword and it is used ...
So I can creat a whole tree of labels, to geht some structure.
Clip06.jpg
But I can declare, that a Label is private, so it remains just in the catalog and will not be writen in the file (C)
Or I can declare, that a label is not a keyword and it is used ...
- 01 Oct 17 12:16
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Labels assign to field "State"
- Replies: 19
- Views: 15806
Re: Labels assign to field "State"
Ok. On the left Side I create a Flag "Test" as you see in Pic01
Pic01.jpg
Result in Pic02
Pic02.jpg
So I can assign the Flag Test to Photos and the Keyword will be placed in the field Keywords
When I'm creating a Flag or Keyword like "Test2" as shown in Pic05
Pic05.jpg
The Flag or Keyword ...
Pic01.jpg
Result in Pic02
Pic02.jpg
So I can assign the Flag Test to Photos and the Keyword will be placed in the field Keywords
When I'm creating a Flag or Keyword like "Test2" as shown in Pic05
Pic05.jpg
The Flag or Keyword ...
- 01 Oct 17 7:56
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Labels assign to field "State"
- Replies: 19
- Views: 15806
Re: Labels assign to field "State"
As I was going through the process, step by step, I saw that the Flag will be added in the Field "Keywords" !
So If I do not declare a specifique XMP-Field, it will be writen in the Field "Keywords". Did I get it right?
Here are the two settings:
Thanks for checking it!
Pic03.jpg
Pic04.jpg
So If I do not declare a specifique XMP-Field, it will be writen in the Field "Keywords". Did I get it right?
Here are the two settings:
Thanks for checking it!
Pic03.jpg
Pic04.jpg