Photo Supreme

fbungarz wrote: 22 Jan 24 17:12 …PSu is the only program that provides users with managing their images using these different concepts - both versions and stacks.

Frank, false impression - PSU is not the only program that knows and deals with both versions and stacks.

To me the underlying problem seems to be the same as handled in https://forum.idimager.com/viewtopic.php?t=33704 .

@fbungarz
Occasionally it helps to restart PSu if it becomes unresponsive, but this is actually quite dangerous, because the database may become corrupted and then things will ...

Ingo,

IMO your evaluation is perfectly right.

It is not only a problem when importing but also if syncing large numbers of images. With 64GB RAM I can manage about 4k images on Win before memory exhausts.

Never before did I notice ever growing memory consumption with each and every item being ...

Well, especially "replace" doesn't work any longer at rhe moment. Try to truncate the filename at the desired position, add the new text and finish with the needed text at the end of the filename; that are 3 steps in total to replace the "replace" function.

Thank you for sharing your opinion. I think we should now cease our little discussion.

Without modifying you can not generate anything.

Without doubt that one is true - but it's not the topic. We are talking about generated images that are modified. And the specs tend to the first and not the last software/firmware being used.

I don't care at all if people prefer "Hert's way" or ...

Mmmmh - perhaps best to have a look at the specs: EXIF 2.32 describes the tag as follows

D38FEBE2-CD60-430A-9B5F-1AF3372E547E.jpeg

What I read from the specs:

it‘s all about „generate“ not „last modified“
topic is the „image“ not any metadata
it‘s not totally clear whether originater must ...

Build 4430 fixed this as well. Thank you.

Same here

Ups! .dop files aren't recognized any longer! Can that please be fixed again?

Thank you. Works perfectly again.

With build 4414 the script only shows "Unknown member method..."

There is no need to store the Focus Distance as it is part of the makernotes - but apparently only for Nikon cameras. As far as I can judge it the field is not provided by PSU as a makro; perhaps Hert could double check it?

I hope you are aware of the limited reliability especially of this field ...

Just realized that "favorites" are missing as well... That is, Version "1.4 added support for label sets and favorites" would be even better!!

I definitely agree! Version "1.4 added support for label sets" would be great!!