I've been putting up with this particular issue for ages, and finally decided to do a forum search.
It happens for me regularly too. Nearly every time I do an import from an SD card.
It's a minor issue but annoying. If there's anything I can try or any info I can gather please let me know.
Search found 82 matches
- 12 Sep 21 10:40
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: "Mark none" has to be clicked twice
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2499
- 21 Aug 21 23:05
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Facial recognition: a new option
- Replies: 23
- Views: 18090
Re: Facial recognition: a new option
Got it. Thank you!
- 21 Aug 21 9:15
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Facial recognition: a new option
- Replies: 23
- Views: 18090
Re: Facial recognition: a new option
Hi All. I've been wanting to do face recognition in PSU and found this thread with interest. I'm playing with TTP and it seems to work quite well.
I am confused though, because the opening post seems to suggest that PSU can do this too, only I've never been able to find a way to make PSU do face ...
I am confused though, because the opening post seems to suggest that PSU can do this too, only I've never been able to find a way to make PSU do face ...
- 14 Jun 21 2:34
- Forum: Photo Supreme Workflows
- Topic: Handling RAW + JPG
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7007
Handling RAW + JPG
I shoot RAW+JPG since I moved to a Nikon Z50. The main reason is that I can quickly pull OOC JPGs using SnapBridge for sharing.
I use PSU for ingesting the RAWs from SDcard. I dont ingest the JPGs, and once I've ingested the RAWs I have no reason to keep the JPGs. Can anyone suggest a way I could ...
I use PSU for ingesting the RAWs from SDcard. I dont ingest the JPGs, and once I've ingested the RAWs I have no reason to keep the JPGs. Can anyone suggest a way I could ...
- 03 Jan 20 7:40
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Do not create a label v This label is private
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6702
Re: Do not create a label v This label is private
Right you are sir.
I set the category to public, then reset those labels, then set the category back to private. Now the entire 'Places' tree is italicised.
However, I then added another label under Places and it appeared as non-italicised, even though it is obviously private. Setting 'Places' to ...
I set the category to public, then reset those labels, then set the category back to private. Now the entire 'Places' tree is italicised.
However, I then added another label under Places and it appeared as non-italicised, even though it is obviously private. Setting 'Places' to ...
- 03 Jan 20 3:48
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Do not create a label v This label is private
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6702
Re: Do not create a label v This label is private
OK. It's just that not all the labels are in italics. The top-level 'Places' is, and some of the sub-labels, but not all.
- 02 Jan 20 23:11
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Do not create a label v This label is private
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6702
Re: Do not create a label v This label is private
Thanks Hert. I had some fuzzy thinking going on there. You are right of course. Setting it to Private is the obvious and correct way to go.
I am noticing, with Places set to Private, that PSU is not writing the GPS info to the files unless I manually perform 'Write Metadata to File'. At least that ...
I am noticing, with Places set to Private, that PSU is not writing the GPS info to the files unless I manually perform 'Write Metadata to File'. At least that ...
- 02 Jan 20 6:59
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Do not create a label v This label is private
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6702
Re: Do not create a label v This label is private
Is there a way to make this selection inheritable to sub-labels?
Use case:
In my catalog I am using 'Places' for geo-tagging. I set a geo location on the catalog label and then assign the label to the images that were taken at that location. However I don't want the label name written as a keyword ...
Use case:
In my catalog I am using 'Places' for geo-tagging. I set a geo location on the catalog label and then assign the label to the images that were taken at that location. However I don't want the label name written as a keyword ...
- 30 Dec 19 10:42
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Redate with Cumulative shifting not working
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2042
Re: Redate with Cumulative shifting not working
Build 2616 works. Thanks Hert.
- 30 Dec 19 1:06
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Redate with Cumulative shifting not working
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2042
Redate with Cumulative shifting not working
Hi all,
I'm running the standalone version 5.3.0.2607. I'm trying to organise a collection of film scans by assigning approximate dates. The strategy I have used successfully in the past is two steps:
(1) Run re-date to set all images in a set to the same date
(2) Run re-date a second time using ...
I'm running the standalone version 5.3.0.2607. I'm trying to organise a collection of film scans by assigning approximate dates. The strategy I have used successfully in the past is two steps:
(1) Run re-date to set all images in a set to the same date
(2) Run re-date a second time using ...
- 13 Jun 19 6:51
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Stripping out metadata
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3805
Re: Stripping out metadata
So thanks to you folks I think I've got this pretty well cleaned up.
I started with exiftool -r -all= --exif:all *.jpg
exiftool raised errors on a bunch of files with mangled makernotes so I ran exiftool -makernotes= over those files and then re-ran the above on them.
Then I found some old tags ...
I started with exiftool -r -all= --exif:all *.jpg
exiftool raised errors on a bunch of files with mangled makernotes so I ran exiftool -makernotes= over those files and then re-ran the above on them.
Then I found some old tags ...
- 12 Jun 19 22:32
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Stripping out metadata
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3805
Re: Stripping out metadata
Thanks all for the input. EXIFtool is a very powerful tool. I think I can come to grips with the command-line, limited mainly by my shallow understanding of metadata structure.
Back to Hert's suggestion, and to check my understanding, is this what you had in mind?
exiftool -all= --exif:all *.jpg ...
Back to Hert's suggestion, and to check my understanding, is this what you had in mind?
exiftool -all= --exif:all *.jpg ...
- 11 Jun 19 7:40
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Stripping out metadata
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3805
Stripping out metadata
Hi all,
My jpgs have been through quite a history, back and forth between a number of DAMs. As a result they have weird bits of metadata buried away in a heap of different places. I’d really like to clean this up. Can anyone suggest a way (either in PSU or some external utility) to strip out all ...
My jpgs have been through quite a history, back and forth between a number of DAMs. As a result they have weird bits of metadata buried away in a heap of different places. I’d really like to clean this up. Can anyone suggest a way (either in PSU or some external utility) to strip out all ...
- 20 Jun 17 23:26
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Question about ingesting
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4006
Re: Question about ingesting
Thanks. Added my support to it.
Steve
Steve
- 19 Jun 17 1:35
- Forum: Photo Supreme
- Topic: Question about ingesting
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4006
Question about ingesting
(Importing in PSU terminology)
I currently use Photo Mechanic for ingesting RAWs from camera. I'm investigating whether I can use PSU instead. So far the answer seems to be 'mostly YES' except for one thing:
In cases where I have fired a burst of shots I will often go through the burst at 100% to ...
I currently use Photo Mechanic for ingesting RAWs from camera. I'm investigating whether I can use PSU instead. So far the answer seems to be 'mostly YES' except for one thing:
In cases where I have fired a burst of shots I will often go through the burst at 100% to ...