Photo Supreme

Today!
Here is what's new:

https://www.idimager.com/what-s-new-in-photo-supreme-v5

Yes Geoff, that's the process I follow as well.

Roberto

Names seems to be present as catalogs labels only (probably due to my PSU settings): however I can see names superimposed in the photo (see attached example). Face areas are listed in the "mwg-rs" XMP group.

I want to share my recent experience tagging some 10k+ pictures in my DB in the last weeekend. I have being using PSU since 2015 (v3 back then, and now v4), after a long due diligence looking for the best DAM for my needs. So far I am very satisfied with the choice: PSU is not perfect (no piece of s...

Apologies: Server Postgres

Roberto

It seems that my PSU DB backup can't be restored by the current build of PSU V4 (1490), as it was created by a previous V4 build (1573? 1566? I'm not sure about what point in time the DB format changed). Does anybody know if/where it is possible to download a specific build of PSU V4? (it appears th...

Same problem here!

PSU backup problem.jpg This message popped up while trying to restore the PSU DB: does anyone have a clue on what could have gone wrong? Running PSU 4.0.1.115 PostGRE SQL on win10: the db backup is on the local disc while the main DB is on a separate server (NAS) Any help would be appreciated as I ...

Ok, it seems that I solved the issue. :D I believe it was related to some operations I did last time I performed a DB backup within PSu. If memory serves me well the steps I did were: 1) I backupped my PSU DB to a directory on my primary NAS 2) Then that directory was moved to my secondary NAS (as a...

It seems to me that PSu 3.3 is still well ahead to Daminion v5. Just to name some areas: PSu label assignment speed is unmatched, XMP fields support is total (less so with Daminion) and easily managed through label-XMP field coupling rules, boolean search engine and client-server support are much mo...

I re-created from scratch two more Postgre DBs on 2 different NASes (Postgre versions: 9.3.4.2 and 9.3.13.3) and installed PSu version 2604 on the Win10 PC ... no luck with any combination ... :cry: Hert: what Postgre version are you using in your tests? could you please hint where to look in the DB...

Ok, I re-tested it with both "lowest level" folders and "intermediate level" ones...the result seems inconsistent to me, please have a look... :shock: https://youtu.be/HDfbHDnVxvU Compacting the DB did not help... This behaviour is the same when accessing the DB (Postgre, on my QNAP NAS) from each o...

Apologies for my limited language skills: could you please help me with the "koerst level" meaning?
Anyhow: I will be able to try again PSu next friday as I'm out of town at the moment.
Thanks

Roberto

I'm using 2603, PostgreSQL version, DB on NAS, clients on win10 and win7 (both show the same issue). It used to work in the past (as shown in the video, some "older" colored folders survived the tree compression/expansion cycle)

It seems that I am not able anymore to change the "status" color of my photo folders...
When I compact the folder tree and then I expand it back the assigned color is gone...
Has any of you experienced this issue?
Please have a look to the recorded screenshot:

https://youtu.be/LmSSo7br6iY